Quote:
Originally Posted by truble2301  That's just funny. Here's a hint for something you might consider: the alphabet. Link
And S. Res 580? As of today has more Republican co-sponsors than Democratic co-sponsors.
Isolationism -- I don't think it means what you think it means. |
It has nothing to do with the alphabet.
Edited to add link
sponsoring and cosponsoring legislation: Information and Much More from Answers.com
"The sponsors of a bill are its principal authors. Bills often take their sponsors' names, such as the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act, known for its three Senate sponsors, or the Humphrey-Hawkins Act, known for its chief sponsors in the Senate and House of Representatives. To demonstrate the popularity of a bill and to gather further support, sponsors will send out “Dear Colleague” letters, circulating the bill among other members and urging them to cosponsor it. The names of sponsors and cosponsors are printed at the top of each bill and in the Congressional Record."
The bottom line is that Democrats say one thing and do another. That are against a war but vote to fund a war.
Nonintervention is not the same as isolationism
I will not be on much today. So, I do not have the time today to argue the different points.
Hope everyone has a Happy 4th!