Quote:
Originally Posted by hambirg  No! It just makes them a hypocrite. Just like a woman that campaings against abortion rights, then finds her self in a position where she chooses to have an abortion. Is she a criminal? No! Is she a hypocrite? Yes! Is she a scumbag? I'm not sure. . .
The fact of the matter is that wildwood didn't present it that way. Are these guys skummy? Sounds like it. BUT that's not how she posted it. Hence my warning to her to be VERY careful. She made a post lumping names next to "homosexual encounter" along with names posted next to crimes. She never came back and explained herself. She never apologized for not being more clear. Soooo. . . her post was homophobic. Is she a homophobe. . .I really don't think so, BUT the fact that she never came back and corrected herself makes her suspect. |
The reason I haven't posted yet is because unlike some of you, I have a life. First off, I do not consider homosexuals bad, scumbaggy or any other derogatory term. I posted that list because someone posted that the Dems seemed to attract venomous scumbags. The list was to just point out that they can be found on both sides of the aisle. And since many many Republicans consider homosexuality to be wrong, they were included in the list.
The fact is, that scumminess is bipartisan and if you want to throw that mud to the Dems, then expect it to get thrown back at you. My list only included sexual scumminess. If I had included non-sexual criminal scumminess it would have been way too long to post for either the D's or the R's.