View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008, 09:34 PM
hambirg's Avatar
hambirg hambirg is offline
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by kvmj View Post
There were investigations launched into the woman's testimony. She was found to not be credible. There was no evidence and absolutely no one saw anything like what she described. The fact that she's lying doesn't seem to be of much concern to the pro life movement.

In conclusion, it's not a chilling video. It's ho hum.

That's all well and good, but why would Obama have a problem with the legislation then? The legislation says that if the aborted fetus is still alive than the medical team has an obligation to save it. How can you argue with that? Apparently Obama was the only legislator that had a problem with it. If in fact, it isn't really happening in a clinical situation then why the problem? Why can't we agree that if, God forbid, an attempted abortion results in a live fetus, then that is a human being, that has rights under our constitution and under the Hypocratic oath? If it's really a situation that doesn't happen. . .then why not support the legislation??
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm