Quote:
Originally Posted by truble2301  Nice try, but he only has to do it if a Court of competent jurisdiction orders it and if Berg and the other fringies jump through all the hoops first -- little things like subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, standing, prima facie case. Haven't seen any evidence of that so far . . . just more fringe theories which have been repeatedly debunked. Repeatedly. Linky dinky |
The link you provided is from Friday, June 27th, 2008 at 05:21 p.m.
I will try to find the article from Nov about the Supreme Court justice setting a Dec 1, 2008 date for Obama to present his birth certificate to the court.
ETA: I really do not understand why Obama will just not release his birth certificate to the court. What is there to hide? And it would put an end to all these "crazy" lawsuits.
Seems so simple.
I have not seen any reason why he could not release the information to the court. Does anyone have a reasonable answer why Obama does not do that? Why keep on with these "crazy" lawsuits and employing a special lawyer to deal with them?
Ok..maybe Obama according to some people does not have to turn over the documents. Either way it just seems simpler and easier to just provide the courts with the information and go on with life.