Quote:
Originally Posted by deddlastt  The issue is mulit-faceted. For starters, again you dance (albeit a clumsy dance) around what aia states, with a weak try at diversionary tactics.
IF it had been Palin disclosing this, you would have been all over hammering her with a rumba. This isn't even a party lines thing. It's a common sense thing in that you don't divulge that kind of information, whether it is being used, could be used, will be used, or was being used.
Keep your day job, a political analyst you are not.
dl |
It is true that Truble neither follows Faux news nor Rush. Sometimes, I imagine it is as hard for Truble as it is for me to follow the GOP "thinking" process.
To counter a statement with a factual statement (it's not a "bunker" anymnore) is neither diversionary nor dancing around.
Everyone knows that there are bunkers under the White House. Everone knows that there are bunkers at Langley. It stands to reason that the vice president's residence would have some sort of safety features. Cheney was well known for his paranoia.
I assume that you know that the Biden's are using this former "safe" room as a guest bedroom now. I assume that you have somehow used this fact to feel less personally secure (everything seems to instil irrational fear in you people)
So be it.
I am happy to know that the grown ups are now in charge.