View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009, 07:13 PM
Kelliiii's Avatar
Kelliiii Kelliiii is offline
Lifetime Member - Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Richmond, VA Area
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
They have no mother at all, their dad is dead, and now they can have their primary emotional attachment with someone who is more likely than not to die before they themselves are married/parents.

If an aunt and uncle are stable and able, that would be my vote.
Not your kids. You don't get a vote. His kids. He picked the person he trusted the most. If the courts see an issue with this, they will address it. If you don't think your mother is the right person to take care of your kids, then get that in your will.

I'm sure she is well aware of her own age and realizes that she isn't the long term solution. In the short term, why wouldn't someone want their own mother (if they had a good trusting relationship with her) to help their kids and make decision for them through the shock of losing a parent. Just because she becomes the primary now, doesn't mean that it how it will be a year from now. Their "primary emotional" attachment just died....how do you know that their grandmother isn't the next closest thing they have?
__________________
I'm the kind of woman when my feet hit the floor in each morning, the devil says "Oh crap, she's up."
Reply With Quote