Quote:
Originally Posted by kathytheshopper  So what Marilyn? So what if a fetus cannot survive on it's own? We've been over this many times. People like Christopher Reeve could not either. He was still a human being with his own dna, etc... and so is that little "unviable" fetus. When I was growing up the odds of a premie living were pretty dire but now they can save babies at 26 weeks gestation. How does that fit into a viability theory? I guess with your theory those premies really aren't people because they were born before they should have been viable. Premies can't survive on their own. Heck an infant can't survive on it's own either. I think that viability issue has a lot of holes in it. Bonding doesn't equate with whether or not the fetus is a human either.
Please quote where I was "overjoyed" with his death. |
*snort* we can't quote where you were overjoyed---because you deleted the whole damned thread! Of course, allegedly, you maintained a copy of it since you think I threatened you. For the love of God, woman--you are what gives anti-choice/anti-abortion people a bad name. You're a zealot.
FYI--26 months is well past the 2nd trimester.
It's really simple: Do you think a person should have the right to seek medical treatment? Do you think people should be able to choose what kind of medical treatment they receive? Should a person with cancer be able to choose whether they undergo chemo/radiation or not?