|
My understanding is that the unions cried foul when it became clear that the amount an employer spends on your benefits would be counted as taxable income. If you've got a health insurance policy that costs $25K/year - one of those policies that have little to no deductibles, etc. - then suddenly your income on your W-2 would show a $25K increase, and you'd be taxed at that rate, and probably even find yourself in a higher bracket.
The union leaders said, "Hold on! A tax on that $25K equals thousands of dollars, and you can't just spring that on people! They didn't get a raise or anything, but will suddenly have to find extra money to pay that new tax. We won't give you our financial backing if you keep that tax in there, as is."
So congress and the administration said, "Okay, if you have an expensive policy, we won't make you pay taxes on benefits until 2018."
The unions said, "Whew. Okay. Game on!"
Meanwhile... if you make $30K-$50K and your employer pays $10K towards your bennies, you suddenly appear to be making $40K - $60K and are taxed at that rate. No special government breaks for you! You make less to begin with, probably have less disposable income to begin with... and yet your taxes will go up, but the higher-paid union workers will see no increase in their tax bill.
The threshold for "cadillac" is a question mark to me.
I don't think any of us - union or otherwise - should incur this new tax.
|