All Categories:
People Saved
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Go Back   MyCoupons.com Shopping Boards > My ShoppingBoards Community > The Cafe - 'TC'
 


The Cafe - 'TC' So? Your daughter wants her belly pierced? Your cat keeps using the couch as a litter box? Your husband taped the Hockey game over your wedding video? Your neighbor has a gnome collection and it makes you mad? Pour yourself a cup of coffee and come on in to The Café! Talk amongst yourselves...discuss, question, reply, or respond to many subjects!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 09:05 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
Chris Matthew's leg is no longer shivering.

Breitbart.tv » Thrill Is Gone? Matthews Turns On Obama; ‘I Hear Stories That You Would Not Believe’
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 09:19 AM
jujubee2's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,154
Can't stand rants.

Did he ever support Obama?

In January 2010, in Matthews's comments after President Obama's first State of the Union Address, he says "You know, I forgot he was black tonight for an hour."

What a gem.
__________________
If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition, and then admit that we just don't want to do it.

- Stephen Colbert.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 09:34 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
Oh, my dear...

He absolutely was one of Obama's biggest cheerleaders. He's well known for saying - after hearing Obama give an acceptance speech after beating Hillary in an important primary - that he feels a thrill up his leg when he hears Obama give a speech.

What he's saying in that clip - I believe - is that Obama hasn't followed through with a lot of things he said were important to him on the campaign trail, and that he wants an update.

I googled quickly, and found this on Salon.com from a year ago: The promises Obama wants you to keep forgetting - Barack Obama - Salon.com

“I’ll lead a new era of openness. I’ll give an annual ‘State of the World’ address to the American people in which I lay out our national security policy.”

“[Obama] endorses the goal of sending human missions to the Moon by 2020, as a precursor in an orderly progression to missions to more distant destinations, including Mars.” After the campaign, returning to the Moon faded from Obama’s agenda. Finally, in the 2011 budget, the administration completely abandoned the idea, calling the NASA Moon program “over budget, behind schedule, and lacking in innovation due to a failure to invest in critical new technologies.”

”Barack Obama will double the Peace Corps to 16,000 by its 50th anniversary in 2011 and push Congress to fully fund this expansion, with a focus on Latin America and the Caribbean.”


“Too often bills are rushed through Congress and to the president before the public has the opportunity to review them. As president, Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.”


”I cannot guarantee that it is going to be in the first 100 days. But what I can guarantee is that we will have in the first year an immigration bill that I strongly support and that I’m promoting. And I want to move that forward as quickly as possible.”


Some of those are things that were important to Chris Matthews, I guess, and he apparently wants to know why they haven't happened...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 11:26 AM
jujubee2's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,154
I find commentators who rant obnoxious - on the left or the right.
__________________
If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition, and then admit that we just don't want to do it.

- Stephen Colbert.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 11:36 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
You call that a rant?

I guess I really don't. He goes on and on... but I don't think he's 'ranting'.

rant
verb (used without object)
1. to speak or declaim extravagantly or violently; talk in a wild or vehement way
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 12:55 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SE MA
Posts: 1,657
Ah....the Nobel Peace Prize before he even took office......
__________________
Nobody can make you feel inferior without your consent.

E. Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 01:29 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
LOL, suezz!

Thanks for that hysterical reminder! :-)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 01:48 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SE MA
Posts: 1,657
Yep....and now it is not funny WOW..Who were those intelligent people and why were they so deluded by him? His speeches were pretty much "look at the left hand teleprompter, stick nose in the air and look at the right hand teleprompter" and people were in a quiver over him???
__________________
Nobody can make you feel inferior without your consent.

E. Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 01:53 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
I just hope we have some change left in our pockets by the time we're rid of him! :-)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 03:47 PM
jujubee2's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
You call that a rant?

I guess I really don't. He goes on and on... but I don't think he's 'ranting'.

rant
verb (used without object)
1. to speak or declaim extravagantly or violently; talk in a wild or vehement way
Yes, I call that a rant. I think O'Reilly rants too.

I use the Merriam Webster definition, with the emphasis on declamatory:
to talk in a noisy, excited, or declamatory manner

The Merriam Webster definition of declamatory being:
Pretentiously rhetorical; bombastic

Bush drained our pockets and you expect Obama to refill them?!
__________________
If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition, and then admit that we just don't want to do it.

- Stephen Colbert.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 03:56 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
Bombastic - I believe that was one of O'R's vocab words last week!

Woot!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 04:39 PM
jujubee2's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,154
Really? He had to define bombastic for his listeners?!
__________________
If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition, and then admit that we just don't want to do it.

- Stephen Colbert.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 05:53 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
Nope. Every night he ends with a seldom-used word just 'cause his viewers are smart and appreciate the opportunity for the intellectual review.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 06:04 PM
jujubee2's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,154
I wouldn't call vocabulary "intellectual review," given that most "intellectuals" already own a dictionary. If they had any curiosity, they'd just look up and learn a new word on their own now and then. They wouldn't need a blow-hard like O'Reilly to do it for them.
__________________
If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition, and then admit that we just don't want to do it.

- Stephen Colbert.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 06:18 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
Oh, I didn't say they were 'intellectuals'.

Let's save that rather pompous term for the libs, shall we?

:-)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2011, 06:27 PM
jujubee2's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,154
If he's providing something for "intellectual review", who's doing the reviewing?

If I provide something for "scientific review" I would be asking scientists to review it, no?

I think you just called yourself a pompous liberal, LOL!
__________________
If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition, and then admit that we just don't want to do it.

- Stephen Colbert.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2011, 08:13 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
There are nouns...

And there are adjectives...

And there are words that can be used as one or the other...
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2011, 09:19 AM
jujubee2's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,154
No matter how thin you slice it, intellectuals are the target of "intellectual review." Bazinga!
__________________
If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition, and then admit that we just don't want to do it.

- Stephen Colbert.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 11-23-2011, 01:57 PM
KellyJef's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 6,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by jujubee2 View Post
Yes, I call that a rant. I think O'Reilly rants too.

I use the Merriam Webster definition, with the emphasis on declamatory:
to talk in a noisy, excited, or declamatory manner

The Merriam Webster definition of declamatory being:
Pretentiously rhetorical; bombastic
Of course you would put the emphasis on the word "declamatory". I would put the emphasis on excited (as in being passionate) in reference to O'Reilly.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 11-23-2011, 08:02 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 288
Quote:
Originally Posted by jujubee2 View Post
No matter how thin you slice it, intellectuals are the target of "intellectual review." Bazinga!
Bazinga! Cracked me up, love The Big Bang Theory on TV too!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 PM.



Ad Management by RedTyger