It's time for some small talk. Heh. So... here's a question for you.

It seems that big stars are always fighting the paparazzi...

Do you think that it goes with the territory; part of being famous, or do you think the rich and famous deserve some privacy?

It seems to have gotten even more out of hand with the internet age.

Thoughts?!

I think it goes with the terrritory, however there are some instances where they should be left alone. They should not be stalked at home from the hills so someone can get a glimpse of them in a bikini or even worse topless! Ya know??

__________________
I found Jesus! He was behind the couch!

I think it's gotten out of hand - how terrible it must be to have those cameras shoved all around - I would especially be scared for my children

__________________
Bevogal

I think if goes with the territory, but when it comes to their family and kids, I think they should be left alone. I would hate for my dd's to have cameras shoved in their faces. It's scary enough there are so many weirdos out there, but it would be even more frightening if you get that crazy fan or stalker that wants to harm you or your children

I think the cameras need to be left for events only. They are people and they shouldn't have to deal with cameras every time they leave their home.

for those that actively seek fame and fortune - the movie and music stars, I think they know what the deal is before they get to that point. Heck, we know and we're not famous. So they make that choice.

On the other hand, people like Princes Harry & William - they did not choose their life, so I think they deserve some privacy.

__________________
"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? " ~Epicurus