All Categories:
People Saved
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Go Back   MyCoupons.com Shopping Boards > My ShoppingBoards Community > The Cafe - 'TC'
 


The Cafe - 'TC' So? Your daughter wants her belly pierced? Your cat keeps using the couch as a litter box? Your husband taped the Hockey game over your wedding video? Your neighbor has a gnome collection and it makes you mad? Pour yourself a cup of coffee and come on in to The Café! Talk amongst yourselves...discuss, question, reply, or respond to many subjects!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2009, 02:02 AM
hambirg's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
Can someone please tell us how Janet Napolitano got her job?

This lady is really not very smart. The same lady who labeled returing vets as possible extremists is now upsetting the Canadians.

http://www.nationalpost.com/todays-p...tml?id=1520295


Quote:
Can someone please tell us how U. S. Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano got her job? She appears to be about as knowledgeable about border issues as a late-night radio call-in yahoo.

In an interview broadcast Monday on the CBC, Ms. Napolitano attempted to justify her call for stricter border security on the premise that "suspected or known terrorists" have entered the U. S. across the Canadian border, including the perpetrators of the 9/11 attack.

All the 9/11 terrorists, of course, entered the United States directly from overseas. The notion that some arrived via Canada is a myth that briefly popped up in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, and was then quickly debunked.

Informed of her error, Ms. Napolitano blustered: "I can't talk to that. I can talk about the future. And here's the future. The future is we have borders."

Just what does that mean, exactly?

Just a few weeks ago, Ms. Napolitano equated Canada's border to Mexico's, suggesting they deserved the same treatment. Mexico is engulfed in a drug war that left more than 5,000 dead last year, and which is spawning a spillover kidnapping epidemic in Arizona. So many Mexicans enter the United States illegally that a multi-billion-dollar barrier has been built from Texas to California to keep them out.

In Canada, on the other hand, the main problem is congestion resulting from cross-border trade. Not quite the same thing, is it?
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2009, 08:03 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
The milennium bomber entered from Canada. We are vulnerable from that border. It would also be fairly easy to enter either coast be sea. If we did anything to protect our borders since 2001, I am not aware of it.

I do know how Chertoff got his job.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2009, 08:28 AM
yngsto6's Avatar
Master
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,214
Those pesky Canadians
Unfortunately, I think this is just the tip of the iceberg.
__________________
Cecilia

"We must love them both--those whose opinions we share and those whose opinions we reject. For both have labored in the search for truth, and both have helped us in the finding of it."
Saint Thomas Aquinas
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2009, 08:18 PM
lilolme's Avatar
Lifetime Member - Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 326
I've been a citizen of Arizona most of my life. She's made such a financial mess in this state, record deficits, went thru the surplus when she took office, I could go on and on. I was thrilled when she got her promotion to get her out of here so the cleanup of her mess could begin. Only problem is that in her current position our security is screwed. Now ask me how I really feel.

Laurie
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-25-2009, 12:34 AM
Master
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Sunny Central
Posts: 957
Wow, is being "promoted" worth it?

In defense of Janet Napolitano, and I'll admit, I'm not up on the issues, but she was sworn as recently as January. When you are the head of an organization, all the good work you do goes unnoticed, but let something go wrong. This lady is in charge of an organization that employs a large number of people. Many of the policies/programs she oversees were already in place when she arrived.
She's probably still trying to wrap her brain around all the intricacies of how the organization works. I'm sure she doesn't know everyone by name, and she's certainly not signing off on every single piece of paper that passes into legislation. She got her job because of a resume and a political career that spoke for itself. She's done a lot of good, and somewhere along the line, she impressed the right people.
It angers me, too, when we vote to put people in office who say they'll vote the way we want them to, but once they've got the office, it's a different story ...
I'll stop here and step off the soap box ...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-25-2009, 01:46 AM
hambirg's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
Yeah, but she's is on a roll lately. First with the changing terrorism to "man made disasters", then claiming just about anyone that did not like the size of the federal government or was former military should be looked at closely as a possible terrorist (or man made disaster artist?), and now Canada is as large a threat as Mexico??

I don't understand why they would pick a govenor for this position as opposed to someone with a background in law enforcement or the military? What does she know about protecting our borders from possible terrorists? She's an embarrassment.
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-25-2009, 05:31 PM
lilolme's Avatar
Lifetime Member - Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 326
In Arizona she started out I believe as a US Attorney prosecuting border issues. The only reason she wanted to be govenor was to put herself in line to Washington. She has always wanted McCain's senate seat. She didn't get it but something better. She was lousy with border issues here and didn't do a darn thing in a border state to help stem the problems. She's not from small town America who found herself in this position, she was the govenor of the state which has the fifth largest city in the US and major border issues. She was in that position several years so she certainly doesn't lack experience, just class. Ok now I'm off my soapbox.

Laurie
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-25-2009, 06:23 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by hambirg View Post
Yeah, but she's is on a roll lately. First with the changing terrorism to "man made disasters", then claiming just about anyone that did not like the size of the federal government or was former military should be looked at closely as a possible terrorist (or man made disaster artist?), and now Canada is as large a threat as Mexico??

I don't understand why they would pick a govenor for this position as opposed to someone with a background in law enforcement or the military? What does she know about protecting our borders from possible terrorists? She's an embarrassment.
The word terrorism invokes fear. All disasters invoke fear. Terrorism is a tactic used by those with small numbers who want to impart a specific emotion; fear. We need to face this threat rationally.

As far as law enforcement goes, I would have to say that that is pretty much all that the job of attorney general entails. She was a US Attorney for Arizona.

I cannot speak to her record as governor; I'm just not familiar with it. I am not aware of any state that does not have a serious deficit problem right now. I know that the Phoenix area had an awful lot of bubble real estate caused by speculation. I also read about one mortgage company that did nothing but fraudulent loans.

At least she can say that Arizona isn't as bad as California, Florida or Michigan.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:12 AM
hambirg's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilolme View Post
In Arizona she started out I believe as a US Attorney prosecuting border issues. The only reason she wanted to be govenor was to put herself in line to Washington. She has always wanted McCain's senate seat. She didn't get it but something better. She was lousy with border issues here and didn't do a darn thing in a border state to help stem the problems. She's not from small town America who found herself in this position, she was the govenor of the state which has the fifth largest city in the US and major border issues. She was in that position several years so she certainly doesn't lack experience, just class. Ok now I'm off my soapbox.

Laurie

Uh.. yeah! That was my point I guess. My brother is a prosecuting attorney. . .doesn't mean he knows a darn thing about security! He knows the law. . .but I wouldn't call him if somebody was threatening me with a gun or holding me hostage. . .duh! She's a hack. . .plain and simple. Have you seen her? The only thing I know for sure is that she didn't get her current position though sexual favors. It was purely a political choice. . and a bad one at that. You will NEVER convince me that there wasn't a police chief, military official, FBI or CIA person that wasn't waaaaay more qualified for her post.
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:38 AM
hambirg's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by kvmj View Post
The word terrorism invokes fear. All disasters invoke fear. Terrorism is a tactic used by those with small numbers who want to impart a specific emotion; fear. We need to face this threat rationally.

As far as law enforcement goes, I would have to say that that is pretty much all that the job of attorney general entails. She was a US Attorney for Arizona.

I cannot speak to her record as governor; I'm just not familiar with it. I am not aware of any state that does not have a serious deficit problem right now. I know that the Phoenix area had an awful lot of bubble real estate caused by speculation. I also read about one mortgage company that did nothing but fraudulent loans.

At least she can say that Arizona isn't as bad as California, Florida or Michigan.
Do you mean "fear" like when they tell us the economy is in the sh*tter unless we go through with these outrageous bailouts? The ones where these banks now get to take the TARP money and create other corps to buyout the bad debt. . .then fold those and actually make money for the "good" bank??? That this is like the Great Depression, even though the numbers aren't even close. That kind of fear???

And come on. .. "man made disasters" is just a euphemism. We are talking symantics here! Where is George Carlin when we need him? Face it! Al Qaeda is in the business of creating "terror"! "Disaster" implies misfortune. .. accident. Terrorism is NO accident! It's like calling gang violence "misguided youth incidences". Sorry.. I'm going to call b*llsh*t when I see it. . and this is b*llsh*t!

Maybe I should have said "security" when I said law enforcement. . that's what I meant. . .NOT a lawyer, but somebody that actually knows how to "protect". She obviously doesn't know a thing about that! But I guess now that she has labeled our returning vets, the ones who actually risk their lives to protect our country, as possible terrorists, she probably doesn't have much respect or ground to stand on with the folks that are actually on the front lines protecting you and I and our freedoms.

I stand by what I said. . .she is an embarrassment and won't last long! She's not even smart enough to realize that most of the folks working for her came directly from the military. My ex is a Homeland Security Officer. . .and a vet. They don't care for her much. Just saying. . .
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 10:13 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
At this point in time, I have no idea how Chertoff handled the job. I only know that he spent an awful lot of money remodelling his offices. I understand that the GAO was unable to audit Homeland Security because no one bothered to keep any records. The only time that I ever saw Chertoff in action was in connection with Katrina. That didn't look very good.

I do not think that it's wise to pass judgement on someone who has held office for only 3 months. I rather think that there is a big mess to clean up.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 10:43 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by kvmj View Post

I do not think that it's wise to pass judgement on someone who has held office for only 3 months. I rather think that there is a big mess to clean up.
I guess, for the record, I'd like to know how long, in your opinion, we are supposed to give her.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 10:58 AM
truble2301's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 14,940
The amount of time you take is meaningless if your mind is welded shut.
__________________

Reading is Fundamental.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 11:25 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
Spoken by the most open-minded and tolerant person I have ever met on the world wide web....
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 12:33 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
She has done nothing so far that indicates incompetence.

Truble is right. You have already made up your mind, likely before she ever took office. % minutes was enough time for you to judge her.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:20 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
Do you really want me to take the time to dig up posts from eight years ago in which the lefties here had already decided the Bush administration was responsible for any and all Clinton holdover issues they had to deal with from the minute they stepped into their offices and popped the W keys back on their keyboards?

I've got a busy day today but can take the time if you really need me to.

For the record, I do think new administrations should be given time to be fully informed about every detail and to get their feet wet before we start criticizing their every move. I haven't followed her long enough to have any strong opinions. I do, however, think it was unwise of her to put a list 'out there' like she did that painted vets in the light that it did. While I understand that the same personality quirks that can draw someone to violent behaviors would draw them to the military, where you get to shoot guns and drive big machines and destroy stuff, I think the same can be said for the super-eco weirdos... and they didn't make the list. The list did seem to be skewed towards the wacko-types that are viewed as being part of the non-mainstream-right, but not so much the non-mainstream-left.

And there are plenty of wacko-extremists on the non-mainstream-left.

As was pointed out by hambirg in another thread, when it was highlighted that the Craigslist killer was a Republican, that the family that died at the hands of the dad - the one where the mom's blog still sits there for us to read - that family was into the Eastern religion/Buddhist scene, ecology, no-animal-testing, and the like.

I'll never understand what profiling is okay and what isn't. I just believe, firmly, that the list you make up shouldn't be a politicized list once you're serving the public good.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:21 PM
truble2301's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 14,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
Spoken by the most open-minded and tolerant person I have ever met on the world wide web....
Thank you.
__________________

Reading is Fundamental.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 02:23 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
Do you really want me to take the time to dig up posts from eight years ago in which the lefties here had already decided the Bush administration was responsible for any and all Clinton holdover issues they had to deal with from the minute they stepped into their offices and popped the W keys back on their keyboards?

I've got a busy day today but can take the time if you really need me to.

For the record, I do think new administrations should be given time to be fully informed about every detail and to get their feet wet before we start criticizing their every move. I haven't followed her long enough to have any strong opinions. I do, however, think it was unwise of her to put a list 'out there' like she did that painted vets in the light that it did. While I understand that the same personality quirks that can draw someone to violent behaviors would draw them to the military, where you get to shoot guns and drive big machines and destroy stuff, I think the same can be said for the super-eco weirdos... and they didn't make the list. The list did seem to be skewed towards the wacko-types that are viewed as being part of the non-mainstream-right, but not so much the non-mainstream-left.

And there are plenty of wacko-extremists on the non-mainstream-left.

As was pointed out by hambirg in another thread, when it was highlighted that the Craigslist killer was a Republican, that the family that died at the hands of the dad - the one where the mom's blog still sits there for us to read - that family was into the Eastern religion/Buddhist scene, ecology, no-animal-testing, and the like.

I'll never understand what profiling is okay and what isn't. I just believe, firmly, that the list you make up shouldn't be a politicized list once you're serving the public good.

Except, Clinton's people didn't take the W keys off the typewriters. It never happened. And, here you are believing a falsehood for more than 8 years.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 03:36 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
So you concur with everything else I said?

This is what the GAO said of Clinton's departure and the wake left at the White House:

Quote:
GAO: Damage, theft, vandalism, and pranks occurred in the White House complex during the 2001 presidential transition. Incidents such as the removal of keys from computer keyboards; the theft of various items; the leaving of certain voice mail messages, signs, and written messages; and the placing of glue on desk drawers clearly were intentional acts.
Soooooo, good buddy, I guess I'm gonna need a link from ya....
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 05:08 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
So you concur with everything else I said?

This is what the GAO said of Clinton's departure and the wake left at the White House:



Soooooo, good buddy, I guess I'm gonna need a link from ya....
I do not concur with anthing you said.

Did you mean this GAO report? U.S. GAO - The White House: Allegations of Damage During the 2001 Presidential Transition
The one that hints at allegations made by Bush staffers? (Iknow that they did put a sign on the door to the oval office labelled "Office of Strategery")

Try reading the whole thing. There were supposedly 4 items missing. Clinton staffers said they weren't there when they got there. There was some damage but that was done when moving out. Bush staffers also said they left too much trash behind.

They hit the ground running with lies and never quit.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2009, 07:50 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
I read plenty enough to know that the Clinton staffers pulled a lot of shenanigans.

I really don't know why this is worth arguing about. I think the "W" thing was not all that destructive, cheap to fix, and had I been there I probably would have gotten a chuckle out of walking in and seeing what they had done. The other alleged things.... not as funny.

I really don't doubt the "W" thing happened. The media was so anti-Bush even from the beginning that if the new Bush staffers had done it, they'd have pounced on the opportunity to share that with America. They were still pretty sad about the recounts and not all that eager to embrace "W" themselves.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2009, 09:27 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
I read plenty enough to know that the Clinton staffers pulled a lot of shenanigans.

I really don't know why this is worth arguing about. I think the "W" thing was not all that destructive, cheap to fix, and had I been there I probably would have gotten a chuckle out of walking in and seeing what they had done. The other alleged things.... not as funny.

I really don't doubt the "W" thing happened. The media was so anti-Bush even from the beginning that if the new Bush staffers had done it, they'd have pounced on the opportunity to share that with America. They were still pretty sad about the recounts and not all that eager to embrace "W" themselves.

This won't be the first time that facts fail to overide a rumor.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 AM.



Ad Management by RedTyger