All Categories:
People Saved
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Go Back   MyCoupons.com Shopping Boards > My ShoppingBoards Community > Friendly Political Discussions - 'POL'
 


Friendly Political Discussions - 'POL' Left, Right, or Center ~ You are All Welcome Here! So let’s hear your comments and opinions… Please be respectful to everybody . Political discussions tend to get heated and that is just fine, however, please remember to treat everybody with the same respect you expect.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 06:45 AM
truble2301's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 14,940
Palin Member of AIP

Some are calling AIP a secessionist group, some calling it separatist. You read and decide. It's certainly not a "Country First" group!


Quote:
The campaign of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., likes to herald the independence of its new running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

Officials of the Alaskan Independence Party say that Palin was once so independent, she was once a member of their party, which, since the 1970s, has been pushing for a legal vote for Alaskans to decide whether or not residents of the 49th state can secede from the United States.

And while McCain's motto -- as seen in a new TV ad -- is "Country First," the AIP's motto is the exact opposite -- "Alaska First -- Alaska Always."

Lynette Clark, the chairman of the AIP, tells ABC News that Palin and her husband Todd were members in 1994, even attending the 1994 statewide convention in Wasilla. Clark was AIP secretary at the time.

"We are a state's rights party," says Clark, a self-employed goldminer. The AIP has "a plank that challenges the legality of the Alaskan statehood vote as illegal and in violation of United Nations charter and international law."

Quote:
Earlier this year, Palin sent a video message to the AIP for its annual convention, where AIP vice chair George Clark told the small crowd that Palin "was an AIP member before she got the job as a mayor of a small town –- that was a non-partisan job. But you get along to go along -– she eventually joined the Republican Party, where she had all kinds of problems with their ethics, and well, I won’t go into that. She also had about an 80 percent approval rating, and is pretty well sympathetic to her former membership."
Link
__________________

Reading is Fundamental.
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 02:52 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
She's now saying that she was only a member for 2 years in the 90s and did not attend their convention. She's lying.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 03:12 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by kvmj View Post
She's now saying that she was only a member for 2 years in the 90s and did not attend their convention. She's lying.
Well let's see......After 20 years with Rev. Wright Obama's never heard any of those nasty speeches, etc... He's lying.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 03:36 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
Palin's church is kind of strange......
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 03:40 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathytheshopper View Post
Well let's see......After 20 years with Rev. Wright Obama's never heard any of those nasty speeches, etc... He's lying.
Obama didn't say he never heard any of the odd ideas; but nasty?
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 04:42 PM
mom2twins2's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 4,436
I swear, it's like a witch hunt around here.

The Democrats will use anything to skirt around the real issues and get the focus off Obama and his inexperience. Plus, Obama stayed in a church that preached hate, was racist and 'damning' America for over 20 years and the only reason he left was because of political pressure.

If I were a democrat (thankfully I'm not), I think I'd be keeping my mouth shut about perceived made-up shortcomings of Gov. Palin and remember Obama's shady past with all sorts of characters that can easily be brought up.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 05:31 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by mom2twins2 View Post
I swear, it's like a witch hunt around here.

The Democrats will use anything to skirt around the real issues and get the focus off Obama and his inexperience. Plus, Obama stayed in a church that preached hate, was racist and 'damning' America for over 20 years and the only reason he left was because of political pressure.

If I were a democrat (thankfully I'm not), I think I'd be keeping my mouth shut about perceived made-up shortcomings of Gov. Palin and remember Obama's shady past with all sorts of characters that can easily be brought up.
I think that God probably did damn America for its treatment of blacks. I do not think He smiled on slavery, lynching or the crushing poverty and lack of opportunity. I do not think that he smiled when exterminated whole tribes of Indians. I think that the Rev. Wright is probably right about that one.

Frankly, without this Black Liberation Movement, I think blacks might be right where they were 50 years ago.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 05:32 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by mom2twins2 View Post
I swear, it's like a witch hunt around here.

The Democrats will use anything to skirt around the real issues and get the focus off Obama and his inexperience. Plus, Obama stayed in a church that preached hate, was racist and 'damning' America for over 20 years and the only reason he left was because of political pressure.

If I were a democrat (thankfully I'm not), I think I'd be keeping my mouth shut about perceived made-up shortcomings of Gov. Palin and remember Obama's shady past with all sorts of characters that can easily be brought up.
OH MY GOSH=CALL AL SHARPTON=CALL JESSE JACKSON=someone used the word "racist". And it wasn't even little ole me! lol
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 07:30 PM
usnamom's Avatar
Premium Member - Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 962
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathytheshopper View Post
OH MY GOSH=CALL AL SHARPTON=CALL JESSE JACKSON=someone used the word "racist". And it wasn't even little ole me! lol
Do you even read the posts, yours and others before you hit submit? What on earth are you talking about? MTT said that she felt the reverends words were racist. She already called them that......

Perhaps you should get a dictionary and find out what exactly constitutes a racist or a racist post. Weird.


ETA: And the discussions about little old you being a racist are from your posts, not your using the word racist. Geesh.
__________________
GO NAVY WRESTLING!!BEAT ARMY!!!
RJB 3/18/60 - 5/22/04
We miss you, sweet brother
God Bless the USA!!!!! Praying for my Youngster son at United States Naval Academy, class of 2014!!

http://mylifeundertheabaya.blogspot.com/
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 07:35 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by usnamom View Post
Do you even read the posts, yours and others before you hit submit? What on earth are you talking about? MTT said that she felt the reverends words were racist. She already called them that......

Perhaps you should get a dictionary and find out what exactly constitutes a racist or a racist post. Weird.


ETA: And the discussions about little old you being a racist are from your posts, not your using the word racist. Geesh.
You are quite confused but I expect that.........
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 07:55 PM
usnamom's Avatar
Premium Member - Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 962
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathytheshopper View Post
You are quite confused but I expect that.........
You are quite a stitch, aren't you. Reading and catching up on the posts today, seems like I am not the only one to ask you the question as to whether you read before you post and then reread your own post before.....seems like good advice.

I am not bashing you, Kathy. I am responding to your posts. I am also not confused, not at all. Not about what is a racist, who is racist nor how the word "racist" is used in any conversation.
__________________
GO NAVY WRESTLING!!BEAT ARMY!!!
RJB 3/18/60 - 5/22/04
We miss you, sweet brother
God Bless the USA!!!!! Praying for my Youngster son at United States Naval Academy, class of 2014!!

http://mylifeundertheabaya.blogspot.com/
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 08:24 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by usnamom View Post
You are quite a stitch, aren't you. Reading and catching up on the posts today, seems like I am not the only one to ask you the question as to whether you read before you post and then reread your own post before.....seems like good advice.

I am not bashing you, Kathy. I am responding to your posts. I am also not confused, not at all. Not about what is a racist, who is racist nor how the word "racist" is used in any conversation.
Nor am I. I am bashed whenever I use the words black, race, racist, white, blue, purple or pink. Since M2T actually used the word racist and no one got bent out of shape it made me laugh. I was bashed for mentioning the "racist" website of Obamas church and how drastically it changed after it was brought up in the news. Why is that more racist than someone saying the preacher/church was racist?
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 09:00 PM
usnamom's Avatar
Premium Member - Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 962
Kathy, you missed the point. I don't remember which post of yours you are talking about but I imagine that you using the word "racist" is not what got you bashed. As a matter of fact, I am sure of it. I would like to see what your post was and some of the comments made after it.

Since you believe that you are a victim of post bashing any time you use certain words, maybe that is a clue that you are not using the words correctly or the words you are using are not forming thoughts that other posters can follow, KWIM? You think you are using the proper word, but in reality, you are offending someone somewhere. I am sure this has been said to you before. If you used the word racist in the fashion that M2T did then you should not have been bashed but since the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior (I watch Dr. Phil), then I pretty much think that it is what else is in your post that is offensive and not the word racist.

I tell my kids, when you think everyone is wrong except you or you think that everyone is out to get you or everyone else is mean, you better look in the mirror because it might just be you. I also told them that when you begin to think everyone else but you is crazy, then it is you who is crazy. Do you see what I am saying?
For me, if I felt like I was being bashed everytime I posted or that there were multiple people saying that I was coming across a certain offensive way, instead of attention seeking by continuing on the same way and then crying the blues that everyone hates me, I would quickly vow to look at my posts, read them aloud to someone else before I hit send. Or be a big girl and take it like a woman, whatever comes down the pike,
__________________
GO NAVY WRESTLING!!BEAT ARMY!!!
RJB 3/18/60 - 5/22/04
We miss you, sweet brother
God Bless the USA!!!!! Praying for my Youngster son at United States Naval Academy, class of 2014!!

http://mylifeundertheabaya.blogspot.com/
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 09:26 PM
sher218's Avatar
Lifetime Member - Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by mom2twins2 View Post
I swear, it's like a witch hunt around here.

The Democrats will use anything to skirt around the real issues and get the focus off Obama and his inexperience. Plus, Obama stayed in a church that preached hate, was racist and 'damning' America for over 20 years and the only reason he left was because of political pressure.

If I were a democrat (thankfully I'm not), I think I'd be keeping my mouth shut about perceived made-up shortcomings of Gov. Palin and remember Obama's shady past with all sorts of characters that can easily be brought up.


AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!! Sister.......but you know the libs...there are one set of rules for them and one set for everyone elseSherri
__________________
"It isn't that liberals are ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so."
- Ronald Reagan
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:21 PM
Expert
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 525
Obama has been in the spotlight for well over 18 months and people have been digging up his past. Palin was thrust into the spotlight due to her vagina last week. She has not yet given an interview or answered any true journalists questions. She has not volunteered any information about herself. It is in everyones best interest if we find out as much about her as we can since she will be on the ballot in a few short months.
The fact is she is not forthcoming to the American public about any of this. Once the information is found then the tap dancing begins. Like it or not this woman on the ticket is a slap in the face to the women who have paved the political way for her. McCain choose her for his own political gain. He needed a woman, one that would shock the world, not necessarily the best female for the job.She is not a breath of fresh air, she is as calculating and ruthless as the rest of them. Her twisting of the few facts we know is proof of that. I have to chuckle every time she says " I said no thanks to the bridge to no where." The money for that darn bridge was already earmarkded for other projects long before she said anything. She was simply acknowledging what had already taken place.
Sponsored Links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:24 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRDNME View Post
Obama has been in the spotlight for well over 18 months and people have been digging up his past. Palin was thrust into the spotlight due to her vagina last week. She has not yet given an interview or answered any true journalists questions. She has not volunteered any information about herself. It is in everyones best interest if we find out as much about her as we can since she will be on the ballot in a few short months.
The fact is she is not forthcoming to the American public about any of this. Once the information is found then the tap dancing begins. Like it or not this woman on the ticket is a slap in the face to the women who have paved the political way for her. McCain choose her for his own political gain. He needed a woman, one that would shock the world, not necessarily the best female for the job.She is not a breath of fresh air, she is as calculating and ruthless as the rest of them. Her twisting of the few facts we know is proof of that. I have to chuckle every time she says " I said no thanks to the bridge to no where." The money for that darn bridge was already earmarkded for other projects long before she said anything. She was simply acknowledging what had already taken place.
Cynical, IMHO
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:25 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by usnamom View Post
Kathy, you missed the point. I don't remember which post of yours you are talking about but I imagine that you using the word "racist" is not what got you bashed. As a matter of fact, I am sure of it. I would like to see what your post was and some of the comments made after it.

Since you believe that you are a victim of post bashing any time you use certain words, maybe that is a clue that you are not using the words correctly or the words you are using are not forming thoughts that other posters can follow, KWIM? You think you are using the proper word, but in reality, you are offending someone somewhere. I am sure this has been said to you before. If you used the word racist in the fashion that M2T did then you should not have been bashed but since the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior (I watch Dr. Phil), then I pretty much think that it is what else is in your post that is offensive and not the word racist.

I tell my kids, when you think everyone is wrong except you or you think that everyone is out to get you or everyone else is mean, you better look in the mirror because it might just be you. I also told them that when you begin to think everyone else but you is crazy, then it is you who is crazy. Do you see what I am saying?
For me, if I felt like I was being bashed everytime I posted or that there were multiple people saying that I was coming across a certain offensive way, instead of attention seeking by continuing on the same way and then crying the blues that everyone hates me, I would quickly vow to look at my posts, read them aloud to someone else before I hit send. Or be a big girl and take it like a woman, whatever comes down the pike,
Didn't even read what you wrote.......don't bother replying to my threads......
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:30 PM
Expert
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 525
I would rather be known as cynical than a lemming. The GOP has put out the biggest joke ever and is sitting back while people fawn over the pick. They couldn't write a comedy this good.
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:33 PM
jenh22's Avatar
Premium Member - Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathytheshopper View Post
Didn't even read what you wrote.......don't bother replying to my threads......
You quoted her just to tell her you didn't read her post?
__________________
Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box.
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:36 PM
momrajum's Avatar
Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northern Lower MI
Posts: 1,261
Why in the world would you say she is a slap in the face to other's who have paved the way? I seriously teared up when I read that. How pathetically sad that you would actually say something like that.

I don't know why, but I am seriously shocked by the hate spewing from the left for this woman. I don't understand.

Melissa
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:37 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by jenh22 View Post
You quoted her just to tell her you didn't read her post?
Started to but knew it was similar to what drops out of animals behinds so I didn't waste my time.
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:43 PM
forrestlayne's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 1,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRDNME View Post
Obama has been in the spotlight for well over 18 months and people have been digging up his past. Palin was thrust into the spotlight due to her vagina last week. She has not yet given an interview or answered any true journalists questions. She has not volunteered any information about herself. It is in everyones best interest if we find out as much about her as we can since she will be on the ballot in a few short months.
The fact is she is not forthcoming to the American public about any of this. Once the information is found then the tap dancing begins. Like it or not this woman on the ticket is a slap in the face to the women who have paved the political way for her. McCain choose her for his own political gain. He needed a woman, one that would shock the world, not necessarily the best female for the job.She is not a breath of fresh air, she is as calculating and ruthless as the rest of them. Her twisting of the few facts we know is proof of that. I have to chuckle every time she says " I said no thanks to the bridge to no where." The money for that darn bridge was already earmarkded for other projects long before she said anything. She was simply acknowledging what had already taken place.
I have bitten my tongue for too long. That "vagina" word is out of place. Say woman..or gender.
Sexism is as bad as racism.

Do you honestly think that Obama got where he did on his "experience"? No, it is on the fact that he is black.

I do believe that both of these canadiates were chosen over other canadiates for that reason.
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 11:02 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by forrestlayne View Post
I have bitten my tongue for too long. That "vagina" word is out of place. Say woman..or gender.
Sexism is as bad as racism.

Do you honestly think that Obama got where he did on his "experience"? No, it is on the fact that he is black.

I do believe that both of these canadiates were chosen over other canadiates for that reason.
Excellent post!
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 11:04 PM
Expert
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 525
Newsflash..... Obama is of mixed race.
Why is vagina out of place. It is simply a part of the female anatomy The GOP needed a female, any female. Sexism;prejudice or discrimination based on sex. That would apply to McCain, he simply went to Palin because she is female and had the required hoha.
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 11:20 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRDNME View Post
Newsflash..... Obama is of mixed race.
Why is vagina out of place. It is simply a part of the female anatomy The GOP needed a female, any female. Sexism;prejudice or discrimination based on sex. That would apply to McCain, he simply went to Palin because she is female and had the required hoha.
Because it sounds so juvenile.
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2008, 11:44 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathytheshopper View Post
Because it sounds so juvenile.
So true, let's use hoha for vagina and your word for penis which, if I remember, is thingie. I feel so grownup.
__________________
Ana
The Republicans have been putting lipstick on a pig for 8 years. Is a pitbull wearing lipstick an attempt to keep us from noticing the pig?
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 12:15 AM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by ana21 View Post
So true, let's use hoha for vagina and your word for penis which, if I remember, is thingie. I feel so grownup.
I didn't bring this up. We could go with Oprahs term-the va jay jay!
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 03:13 AM
Expert
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRDNME View Post
Obama has been in the spotlight for well over 18 months and people have been digging up his past. Palin was thrust into the spotlight due to her vagina last week.
Even if you believe that Palin was chosen solely because she's female, it's a moot point because Obama was chosen solely because he's Black. Or have you convinced yourself that it's his great wealth of experience that got him nominated? LOL.
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 04:29 AM
truble2301's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 14,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by ana21 View Post
So true, let's use hoha for vagina and your word for penis which, if I remember, is thingie. I feel so grownup.
Rats, I spit coffee on my monitor. I can't believe anyone will tell you that the word "vagina" is juvenile, or that it's "out of place."

PRDNME, that was an excellent post and you're absolutely right.

Beyond that, there's no point in even trying to reason with some of the crazy stuff said here. It's like Bizarro-World, what some of the conservatives have said.
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 05:28 AM
usnamom's Avatar
Premium Member - Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 962
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathytheshopper View Post
Didn't even read what you wrote.......don't bother replying to my threads......

Of course I can reply to your rediculous threads. As long as you keep churning them out, I will reply to to them. Which gives me posting security much like job security. I only reply to the silly ones.

I have not been mean to you nor have I been rude to you. I am making sense which pushes a button in you. You know it and so does everyone else who has any common sense.

Put me on ignore, but I am betting you won't. You need the drama in your life so you can cry victim. That's okay. I get it.
__________________
GO NAVY WRESTLING!!BEAT ARMY!!!
RJB 3/18/60 - 5/22/04
We miss you, sweet brother
God Bless the USA!!!!! Praying for my Youngster son at United States Naval Academy, class of 2014!!

http://mylifeundertheabaya.blogspot.com/
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 06:43 AM
forrestlayne's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 1,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRDNME View Post
Newsflash..... Obama is of mixed race.
Why is vagina out of place. It is simply a part of the female anatomy The GOP needed a female, any female. Sexism;prejudice or discrimination based on sex. That would apply to McCain, he simply went to Palin because she is female and had the required hoha.
I know he is mixed race..but that is overlooked.
All it is "first African American" running for President.
The American part of him is white (his mother).

I do think that your posting of the word "vagina" is extremely low-class gutter talk. The same as that the Dem party needed a penis to lead them rather a black penis (not racial..descriptive). In other words the "party for the women" (as they bill themselves) picked a black penis over a vagina.
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 07:03 AM
truble2301's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 14,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by forrestlayne View Post
I do think that your posting of the word "vagina" is extremely low-class gutter talk.
How sad, that you think using the proper word is low-class gutter talk.
__________________

Reading is Fundamental.
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 07:19 AM
forrestlayne's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 1,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by truble2301 View Post
How sad, that you think using the proper word is low-class gutter talk.
How sad that people can not have an intelligent conversation on the ISSUES that are most important to this country. Instead people are slinging "descriptive" words for the main reason for trying to make something sound degrading.

I would love to see the reaction if the word "vagina" was used in the national media in reference to Palin.
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 07:29 AM
truble2301's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 14,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by forrestlayne View Post
How sad that people can not have an intelligent conversation on the ISSUES that are most important to this country. Instead people are slinging "descriptive" words for the main reason for trying to make something sound degrading.

I would love to see the reaction if the word "vagina" was used in the national media in reference to Palin.
Vagina is degrading, now? Dear Lord, I hope you don't have any children to pass that on to. And, if so, I hope you had c-sections, so they didn't have to pass through your -- gasp! -- vagina!!!
__________________

Reading is Fundamental.
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 07:51 AM
forrestlayne's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 1,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by truble2301 View Post
Vagina is degrading, now? Dear Lord, I hope you don't have any children to pass that on to. And, if so, I hope you had c-sections, so they didn't have to pass through your -- gasp! -- vagina!!!
Vaginia in the proper use of the word no problem. Degrading when you use the word in a certain "text".
Example: you can use the word "black" in a certain text and give a degrading meaning. "black anger", etc. You can use the word "black" in other way and it "sounds" fine Obama is considered a black man.

It is the intent of the meaning of the word. The intent clearly is being used as a put-down.
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 08:29 AM
truble2301's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 14,940
It was used properly in the original post.

No human being with a penis and her sparse qualifications would have gotten the VP nod from McCain. He didn't nominate her for her experience, he nominated her because she possessed that most important of qualifications: a vagina.

If that offends you, it's John McCain you need to take it up with.
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 09:37 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by truble2301 View Post
It was used properly in the original post.

No human being with a penis and her sparse qualifications would have gotten the VP nod from McCain. He didn't nominate her for her experience, he nominated her because she possessed that most important of qualifications: a vagina.

If that offends you, it's John McCain you need to take it up with.
She appeals to the far right Christian movement and McCain believes that because she was born female, Hillary supporters will vote for her.
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 09:50 AM
forrestlayne's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 1,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by kvmj View Post
She appeals to the far right Christian movement and McCain believes that because she was born female, Hillary supporters will vote for her.
I do think they were looking for a woman but Palin fit the ticket better than the other women on the McCain's short-list
Very little to do with getting Hillary voters.

They were going after the conservative base vote. Some term it as the "evangelical vote". This is the base that McCain was going after.
Evangelicals rally behind Palin after pregnancy news - CNN.com
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 09:52 AM
truble2301's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 14,940
Palin fit the experience bill better than Kay Bailey Hutchison, Carly Fiorina, Libby Dole, Jodi Rell?

Dang you for making me spit coffee on my monitor again!

Too funny.
__________________

Reading is Fundamental.
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 09:55 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,298
Found this article, an interesting read:

Alaska Party Official Says Palin Was Not a Member - The Caucus Blog - NYTimes.com

September 2, 2008, 10:32 pm
Alaska Party Official Says Palin Was Not a Member
By The New York Times

The chairwoman of an Alaskan political party that advocates a vote on the state’s secession from the union said Tuesday that she had been mistaken when she said Gov. Sarah Palin was a member of the group.

A front-page story in The New York Times on Tuesday and articles in other news media reported that Ms. Palin was a member of the Alaska Independence Party for two years in the 1990’s.

The information in the Times article was based on a statement issued Monday night by Lynette Clark, the party’s chairwoman, who said that Ms. Palin joined the party in 1994 and in 1996 changed her registration to Republican.

On Tuesday night, Ms. Clark said that her initial statement was incorrect and had been based on erroneous information provided by another member of the party whom she declined to identify. The McCain campaign also disputed the Times report, saying that Ms. Palin had been registered consistently as a Republican.

After checking the party’s archives, Ms. Clark said that she could find no documentation that Governor Palin had been a member of the party. She said Ms. Palin attended the party’s 1994 and 2006 conventions and provided a video-taped address as governor to the 2008 convention.

Ms. Clark said that Ms. Palin’s husband, Todd, was a former member of the party.
__________________
Doing the right thing isn't always the same as doing the easy thing.

Last edited by allinaugust; 09-03-2008 at 09:56 AM. Reason: added the article
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 09:58 AM
forrestlayne's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 1,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by truble2301 View Post
Palin fit the experience bill better than Kay Bailey Hutchison, Carly Fiorina, Libby Dole, Jodi Rell?

Dang you for making me spit coffee on my monitor again!

Too funny.

The only 1 you list that was on McCain' short list (if I remember right) is Kay Bailey Hutchison (who is pro-choice)/ Which does not appeal to the "evangelical" base.
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:00 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
Ah, but for the most radical on the left, that is the single litmus test a candidate must pass in order to wear a halo.

All others, please get in line for your spanking - verbal and otherwise.
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:02 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by forrestlayne View Post
Vaginia in the proper use of the word no problem. Degrading when you use the word in a certain "text".
Example: you can use the word "black" in a certain text and give a degrading meaning. "black anger", etc. You can use the word "black" in other way and it "sounds" fine Obama is considered a black man.

It is the intent of the meaning of the word. The intent clearly is being used as a put-down.
I agree. I have had a problem with the use of this word this way, as well. I'm sadly not surprised at some of the people using it in this way, tho
__________________
Doing the right thing isn't always the same as doing the easy thing.
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:07 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,298
Another interesting article/link.

Western Standard
__________________
Doing the right thing isn't always the same as doing the easy thing.
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:07 AM
truble2301's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 14,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by forrestlayne View Post
The only 1 you list that was on McCain' short list (if I remember right) is Kay Bailey Hutchison (who is pro-choice)/ Which does not appeal to the "evangelical" base.
Speaks volumes about John McCain's judgment in putting together his short list, then. He was willing to overlook qualified female members of his own party in favor of a male from a different party.

Remember, Palin doesn't agree with McCain on every item, either. He deplores earmarks and she wallows in them.
__________________

Reading is Fundamental.
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:30 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
I always wonder if you all speak this way in real life to your Republican friends, if you have any.

Wallow is such an extreme, goofball term.

Right now, that's the system. The citizens of the state of Alaska pay taxes into the federal coffers. For any given state to receive any of the monies back that their citizens paid for the use of the state, they must apply for federal funding.

I'll bet if you asked Sarah Palin if she'd prefer that any and all monies paid into those coffers by Alaska's citizens get to simply stay in the state and not have to be sucked to Washington so that congress can decide which state gets to use it, you'd hear a resounding yes.

As things stand, the only way to get a piece of the pie your own citizen's tax dollars funded, you have to apply to Washington.

Would it be responsible of her to refuse to try to receive some of those on behalf of Alaska based on her own belief that it's not the best system?

My understanding about the Bridge to Nowhere was that by the time congress got around to granting that wish, it was no longer really a viable thing. In fact, it was a $400M bridge and the earmark they were going be awarded would've paid about half of that.

I helped a social services related entity complete the application process for $100K in earmark money this year. The project for which they had been seeking funding will cost about $400K. They were requesting $400K and by the time the congressional committees got through with that spending bill it had been whittled down to $100K. Now the question is, "Can we DO the project at all? Do we just refuse the $100K? Can we come up with the other $300K?" It's a quandry, that's for sure.

My understanding is that Palin essentially told congress, "We need the money and we want the money, but we don't want it for that project anymore. Can we keep it and use it for something we DO need?" and they said yes.

Call it wallowing if you want. I assume it's just common sense. I also assume you only hate her so much because her stance on abortion differs from yours.
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:33 AM
truble2301's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 14,940
Well, you know what they say about assuming. Always good to see the proof of it.
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:47 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
Did they teach you these tactics in lawyer school?
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:53 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,298
Funny how there is no comment on the disproving of Gov. Palin being a member of the AIP. Oh, wait, that goes against the "dirt" they are digging up, so I'm on the "ignore list"......ooohhhhhh the HORRORS of it.

That's right, bury your head in the sand. Don't try to get to the bottom of things, just the things that you WANT to be true. Hmmmmmm, says a lot about a person, doesn't it???
__________________
Doing the right thing isn't always the same as doing the easy thing.
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:54 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by allinaugust View Post
Another interesting article/link.

Western Standard
The following is from a poster commenting on the above article. It's a bit of topic but does speak to the "double standard" on at least 2 levels.

Quote:
Jaws,

You know, a lot of people mad a fuss about Michelle Obama saying "for the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback." One was Bill Kristol, who wrote a column for the NY Times about it ( http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/25/op...25kristol.html ). Kristol was also one of the head cheerleaders for picking Palin - a choice he advocated for weeks before it was made. So now that it turns out that her husband was a card-carying secessionist for many years, should the same criticism be leveled at him? Is not sauce for the goose also sauce for the gander here?

If Kristol were a man of integrity, would he not denounce Palin's husband's political associations just as strongly? Should not all who made a fuss of Michelle Obama's comments do the same? What say you Jaws?
Shame on the NYT for not sourcing better but kudos to them for printing a correction.
__________________
Ana
The Republicans have been putting lipstick on a pig for 8 years. Is a pitbull wearing lipstick an attempt to keep us from noticing the pig?
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:58 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by ana21 View Post
The following is from a poster commenting on the above article. It's a bit of topic but does speak to the "double standard" on at least 2 levels.
Hmmm, good point. I wouldn't hold it against Gov. Palin, tho, much like I wouldn't hold the fact that Maria Shriver is a Democrat, against her Republican husband, the wonderul Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, from the Fine state of CALIFORNIA!!!!
__________________
Doing the right thing isn't always the same as doing the easy thing.
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 11:00 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by ana21 View Post


Shame on the NYT for not sourcing better but kudos to them for printing a correction.
Sadly, I think we will see much more of this.
__________________
Doing the right thing isn't always the same as doing the easy thing.
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 11:09 AM
marilynk's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
Did they teach you these tactics in lawyer school?

Yes, that is something they teach in law school. How you use what you are taught falls under ethics and morals. It's been my experience that the very best attorneys either behave ethically and morally (there focus is on quality of cases, not quantity), or the behave unethically and have questionable morals (ther focus on is on quantity, not quality). Now, I'm not saying this applies to every single attorney in America--just the ones that I have dealth with personally. I will add that my job requires daily contact w/ attorneys.
__________________
Mental that one, I'm telling you. ---Ron Weasley, "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets"
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 11:16 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
Sorry, marilyn - I wasn't clear.

I meant the badgering, name-calling, and sidways incinuations about the intelligence of posters who disagree.

I would assert that while it may be helpful in getting someone who knows critical information to fess up, this is a very different opportunity for interaction, and directing hyperbole at posters and politicians absent credible discussion of the issues is more tiresome than effective.
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 11:25 AM
marilynk's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
Sorry, marilyn - I wasn't clear.

I meant the badgering, name-calling, and sidways incinuations about the intelligence of posters who disagree.

I would assert that while it may be helpful in getting someone who knows critical information to fess up, this is a very different opportunity for interaction, and directing hyperbole at posters and politicians absent credible discussion of the issues is more tiresome than effective.

what I stated still holds true. Your ethical attorneys know when to shut the attorney "speak" off and discuss things normally. The other, never quite stop being the attorney.
You have to know your audience, and to speak in a manner that best fits the topic, and the people involved.

Again I deal w/ attorneys just about every day--when we're talking business it's a whole different tone and manner than when we are discussing the Razorback game, or our kids, or local news or gossiping.
__________________
Mental that one, I'm telling you. ---Ron Weasley, "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets"
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 11:26 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
Sorry, marilyn - I wasn't clear.

I meant the badgering, name-calling, and sidways incinuations about the intelligence of posters who disagree.

I would assert that while it may be helpful in getting someone who knows critical information to fess up, this is a very different opportunity for interaction, and directing hyperbole at posters and politicians absent credible discussion of the issues is more tiresome than effective.
Let's not leave out the total disregard of "evidence" by ignoring certain things that are posted. Perfect example would be this thread...... hmmmm ,a little more time spent on "discovery" might be a good thing.
__________________
Doing the right thing isn't always the same as doing the easy thing.
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 11:31 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
... I would assert that while it may be helpful in getting someone who knows critical information to fess up, this is a very different opportunity for interaction, and directing hyperbole at posters and politicians absent credible discussion of the issues is more tiresome than effective.

Well, call me tiresome but I would like more then what appears to be your conclusion that: "... Palin essentially told congress, "We need the money and we want the money, but we don't want it for that project anymore. Can we keep it and use it for something we DO need?" and they said yes."

Especially since during her speech after being introduced as the VP she clearly left "us" with the impression that the bridge to nowhere money was refused.
__________________
Ana
The Republicans have been putting lipstick on a pig for 8 years. Is a pitbull wearing lipstick an attempt to keep us from noticing the pig?
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 11:39 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,982
That's not what I took from her statement.

I thought the heart of it was, "We're not going to take tax dollars and spend them on stupid stuff."

Not that she was against spending them on necessary stuff.
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 11:45 AM
BuckeyeatHeart's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,701
Blog Entries: 3
Thread being closed due to the number of replies
__________________
Nicole





Stop by my Homepage!
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29 AM.



Ad Management by RedTyger