All Categories:
People Saved
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Go Back   MyCoupons.com Shopping Boards > My ShoppingBoards Community > Friendly Political Discussions - 'POL'
 


Friendly Political Discussions - 'POL' Left, Right, or Center ~ You are All Welcome Here! So let’s hear your comments and opinions… Please be respectful to everybody . Political discussions tend to get heated and that is just fine, however, please remember to treat everybody with the same respect you expect.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 09:21 PM
momrajum's Avatar
Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northern Lower MI
Posts: 1,258
SC Dem Chairman Carol Fowler quote...

"Palin's chief qualification is she hasn't had an abortion."

Wow. Of course, that's not exactly what she meant. So sad. Here's the story...

Washington Times - SC Dem chief says sorry for Palin-abortion comment

Here's her excuse....



Fowler has issued a statement, saying, "I personally admire and respect the difficult choices that women make everyday, and I apologize to anyone who finds my comment offensive. I clumsily was making a point about people in South Carolina who may vote based on a single issue. Whether it’s the environment, the economy, the war or a woman’s right to choose, there are people who will cast their vote based on a single issue. That was the only point I was attempting to make."
__________________
Melissa
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 09:32 PM
hambirg's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by momrajum View Post
"Palin's chief qualification is she hasn't had an abortion."

Wow. Of course, that's not exactly what she meant. So sad. Here's the story...

Washington Times - SC Dem chief says sorry for Palin-abortion comment

Here's her excuse....



Fowler has issued a statement, saying, "I personally admire and respect the difficult choices that women make everyday, and I apologize to anyone who finds my comment offensive. I clumsily was making a point about people in South Carolina who may vote based on a single issue. Whether it’s the environment, the economy, the war or a woman’s right to choose, there are people who will cast their vote based on a single issue. That was the only point I was attempting to make."
And that is completely their perogative. Similarly, just like people who choose to vote for Obama, based solely on the war in Iraq.
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 09:41 PM
mom2twins2's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 4,436
Gosh, what's wrong with the democratic party? It's almost like they don't want Obama to win. First is Biden saying Hillary would be a better VP running mate and now Fowler saying this? Oh, and I heard, too, that Fowler's husband said that God planned the hurricane to hurt the Republican Convention.

Are there two democratic parties?
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 09:56 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by mom2twins2 View Post
Gosh, what's wrong with the democratic party? It's almost like they don't want Obama to win. First is Biden saying Hillary would be a better VP running mate and now Fowler saying this? Oh, and I heard, too, that Fowler's husband said that God planned the hurricane to hurt the Republican Convention.

Are there two democratic parties?
WOW, I hadn't heard the Biden remark. I did hear about this woman and her comment today, at the Post Office. I guess I just don't "catch" a lot of things. It was an odd remark, but, I didn't see the awful implication of it. My immediate thought was , "well, Joe Biden hasn't had an abortion either".

Stupid things are being said on both sides, surely. Tensions are high, and I think people are really shooting from the hip.
__________________
Doing the right thing isn't always the same as doing the easy thing.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 01:26 AM
hambirg's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by allinaugust View Post
WOW, I hadn't heard the Biden remark. I did hear about this woman and her comment today, at the Post Office. I guess I just don't "catch" a lot of things. It was an odd remark, but, I didn't see the awful implication of it. My immediate thought was , "well, Joe Biden hasn't had an abortion either".
Stupid things are being said on both sides, surely. Tensions are high, and I think people are really shooting from the hip.
LMAO! I almost spit my diet coke all over my keyboard!
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 02:28 AM
TraciLM's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Ft. Richardson, AK
Posts: 2,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by allinaugust View Post
My immediate thought was , "well, Joe Biden hasn't had an abortion either".
LMAO!

That woman is a real class act - not. What a sickening remark. I think the dems may want to take a few days of "quiet time."
__________________
Proud Wife of an Army Soldier and proud mother of an Army MP currently serving in Iraq.


"To any critics who say a woman can't think and work and carry a baby at the same time, I'd just like to escort that Neanderthal back to the cave." - Sarah Palin
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 10:30 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,940
And don't you know that if the Democrats had selected someone who *had* had an abortion that there are people who would be drawn to her for that reason alone?
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 02:47 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
And don't you know that if the Democrats had selected someone who *had* had an abortion that there are people who would be drawn to her for that reason alone?
Sad but true....
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 03:03 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
And don't you know that if the Democrats had selected someone who *had* had an abortion that there are people who would be drawn to her for that reason alone?

Your statement is ridiculous. While I certainly wouldn't condemn a woman for having an abortion, I certainly wouldn't condemn a woman for giving birth. I should think that's her own business and doesn't need to be shared with the country.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 03:13 PM
marilynk's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
And don't you know that if the Democrats had selected someone who *had* had an abortion that there are people who would be drawn to her for that reason alone?
Well, first of all the woman would have to ANNOUNCE that she had chosen to have an abortion. Most women don't go around declaring that.
I have stated that I had one because I think it's important for all women to understand and know that yes, it can and does happen to anyone. Furthermore, a lot of the women who regret it or have mental health issues regarding the choice to have an abortion--is not their own guilt, but statements and implied statements made by loving, caring, Christians. It's not that women who have had an abortion are necessarily ashamed about having an abortion--it's often a case of they really don't want to deal with hypocritical Christians and certain do-gooders who feel it is their right to call these women murderers or compare these women to murderers or terrorist.

So, a woman would have to announce that she had an abortion for it to become a sticking point in any election. Most women would not announce that because it is a highly personal choice--that THANK GOD! Us women still have the choice on what to do with our bodies. Announcing that you had an abortion would be akin to announcing that your husband liked to be spanked during sex! No one's business!
__________________
Mental that one, I'm telling you. ---Ron Weasley, "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets"
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 03:30 PM
hambirg's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by marilynk View Post
Well, first of all the woman would have to ANNOUNCE that she had chosen to have an abortion. Most women don't go around declaring that.
I have stated that I had one because I think it's important for all women to understand and know that yes, it can and does happen to anyone. Furthermore, a lot of the women who regret it or have mental health issues regarding the choice to have an abortion--is not their own guilt, but statements and implied statements made by loving, caring, Christians. It's not that women who have had an abortion are necessarily ashamed about having an abortion--it's often a case of they really don't want to deal with hypocritical Christians and certain do-gooders who feel it is their right to call these women murderers or compare these women to murderers or terrorist.

So, a woman would have to announce that she had an abortion for it to become a sticking point in any election. Most women would not announce that because it is a highly personal choice--that THANK GOD! Us women still have the choice on what to do with our bodies. Announcing that you had an abortion would be akin to announcing that your husband liked to be spanked during sex! No one's business!
I don't think that's quite what she meant. Fowler was saying that some Palin supporters will vote for her ticket solely based on the abortion issue. I think wowitsdark was just pointing out that the same could be said about some of the people voting for Obama. They will vote solely on the abortion issue.

I try to avoid this subject because I just find it sad. Personally, I oppose abortion on a moral issue. I understand that not everybody feels that way, and I would never try impose my morals on somebody else. For me, the only political issue regarding abortion, is that if someone wants to have one, fine. Just don't pay for it with my tax money.
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 04:27 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by hambirg View Post
I don't think that's quite what she meant. Fowler was saying that some Palin supporters will vote for her ticket solely based on the abortion issue. I think wowitsdark was just pointing out that the same could be said about some of the people voting for Obama. They will vote solely on the abortion issue.

I try to avoid this subject because I just find it sad. Personally, I oppose abortion on a moral issue. I understand that not everybody feels that way, and I would never try impose my morals on somebody else. For me, the only political issue regarding abortion, is that if someone wants to have one, fine. Just don't pay for it with my tax money.
Our tax money is paying for them though!!! Same thing with the failed sex ed programs, etc...
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 04:37 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,940
Here's my point....

Both sides vet the snot out of their candidates, and I can't imagne whether or not a potential candidate has had an abortion doesn't come up. It's way too much a hotbutton issue for either side to be surprised by that information because somebody from some Dr.'s office decided to leak it on the sly halfway through a campaign.

If a Democratic candidate for Pres. or VP had had an abortion, I have to think they'd be savvy enough to be first on the draw with the information, complete with a touching story about her reasons intended to rally the base and convict the undecided.

And just like the Right feels about Palin's decision for life, there are those on the Left who on that reason alone would champion that candidate as someone who really understands, who has *been there*, who represents them, etc.
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 04:39 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathytheshopper View Post
Our tax money is paying for them though!!! Same thing with the failed sex ed programs, etc...
What tax programs pay for abortions? Not denying, I'm just curious to know.I never really gave it much thought.

Planned Parenthood?
Medicare?
Medicaid?
__________________
Doing the right thing isn't always the same as doing the easy thing.
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 04:56 PM
jenh22's Avatar
Premium Member - Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
Here's my point....


If a Democratic candidate for Pres. or VP had had an abortion, I have to think they'd be savvy enough to be first on the draw with the information, complete with a touching story about her reasons intended to rally the base and convict the undecided.
I highly doubt that. I am pro-choice. I would never condemn a women for having an abortion, but it certainly wouldn't be a selling point to me either. Or any other pro-choicers that I personally know.
__________________
Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box.
Sponsored Links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 05:28 PM
marilynk's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathytheshopper View Post
Our tax money is paying for them though!!! Same thing with the failed sex ed programs, etc...
Could you please provide objective documentation that supports your claim?

Private insurance may or may not pay for a selective abortion. Medicare, at one time, would not pay for a selective abortion. Last time I checked, most clinics (regardless of what kind of practice they were) accepted food stamps or WIC vouchers as a form of payment. Most housing assistance is in the form of vouchers which have little or no value to a medical provider. Now, if the woman or her family are receiving AFDC, or SSDI then they might be cashing a check and paying for it that way....

And please explain to me what you mean by "failed" sex-ed programs? I'm intrigued.
__________________
Mental that one, I'm telling you. ---Ron Weasley, "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets"
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008, 07:47 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by marilynk View Post
Could you please provide objective documentation that supports your claim?

Private insurance may or may not pay for a selective abortion. Medicare, at one time, would not pay for a selective abortion. Last time I checked, most clinics (regardless of what kind of practice they were) accepted food stamps or WIC vouchers as a form of payment. Most housing assistance is in the form of vouchers which have little or no value to a medical provider. Now, if the woman or her family are receiving AFDC, or SSDI then they might be cashing a check and paying for it that way....

And please explain to me what you mean by "failed" sex-ed programs? I'm intrigued.
I may be wrong on this. I believe our local government gives grants to the United Way which in turn helps Planned Parenthood, etc... it's more of a trickle down effect.
Failed sex-ed programs-since we have one of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the world I would say what we have been doing isn't working very well.......
From National Abortion Federation.
Funding under Hyde Amendment Only: Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, and Wyoming.

Hyde Amendment and Additional Health Circumstances: Indiana (physical health), Iowa (fetal abnormality), Mississippi (fetal abnormality), Utah (physical health and fetal abnormality), Virginia (fetal abnormality), and Wisconsin (physical health).

All or Most Health Circumstances: Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, and West Virginia.

Noncompliant with the Hyde Amendment: South Dakota (life endangerment only).
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2008, 05:44 AM
cougarskies's Avatar
Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,467
Quote:
Originally Posted by wowitsdark View Post
And don't you know that if the Democrats had selected someone who *had* had an abortion that there are people who would be drawn to her for that reason alone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kvmj View Post
Your statement is ridiculous. While I certainly wouldn't condemn a woman for having an abortion, I certainly wouldn't condemn a woman for giving birth. I should think that's her own business and doesn't need to be shared with the country.
Her statement was not ridiculous. She said that there are people who would be drawn to her for that reason alone and there are. Whether you are one of those people is completely immaterial. Your personal views on birth and abortion don't alter the fact that there are many people who will condemn or vote for a candidate because of those choices.
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2008, 11:35 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by cougarskies View Post
Her statement was not ridiculous. She said that there are people who would be drawn to her for that reason alone and there are. Whether you are one of those people is completely immaterial. Your personal views on birth and abortion don't alter the fact that there are many people who will condemn or vote for a candidate because of those choices.
I can see this happening, yes, I can. A woman gets up and tells her tale of the difficult choice she had to make....carry the child of the beast who raped her, carry the child that will die at birth due to anencephaly (sp??) or some other situation, then tell how grateful she was to have the choice to decide for herself..... yes, I can definitely see it.
__________________
Doing the right thing isn't always the same as doing the easy thing.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 AM.



Ad Management by RedTyger