All Categories:
People Saved
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Go Back   MyCoupons.com Shopping Boards > My ShoppingBoards Community > Friendly Political Discussions - 'POL'
 


Friendly Political Discussions - 'POL' Left, Right, or Center ~ You are All Welcome Here! So let’s hear your comments and opinions… Please be respectful to everybody . Political discussions tend to get heated and that is just fine, however, please remember to treat everybody with the same respect you expect.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2008, 09:15 PM
momrajum's Avatar
Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northern Lower MI
Posts: 1,261
Obama's sex ed bill....

I was really taken aback by the idea that Obama supported sex ed for kindergarten. Then it was explained by the left that no, it was just inappropriate touching education. Ok, fine I guess. However, that is not what this bill said.

McCain was right......

FOXNews.com - Did the McCain Campaign Misrepresent a Sex Education Bill Supported by Obama? - Brit Hume | Special Report

On Sex-Ed Ad, McCain Is Right, National Review Online: What Was That Illinois Sex-Education Bill Really About? - CBS News


as far as I'm concerned, Obama should have addressed this himself.
__________________
Melissa
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2008, 10:15 PM
marilynk's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,021
you know? Sometimes I wonder if politicians actually read these bills before they support them. And if they do read them, why do they support some (the wording on this one is horrible) and not others. I really do wonder if all politicians (regardless of party) try to do too much, or not enough on these bills.
__________________
Mental that one, I'm telling you. ---Ron Weasley, "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets"
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2008, 10:56 PM
momrajum's Avatar
Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northern Lower MI
Posts: 1,261
What frustrates me is the Obama camp knew McCain's ad was not a lie, but they are letting the public believe that it is. I know it goes both ways...
__________________
Melissa
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 07:46 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
If something sounds too stupid to be true, it usually is. McCain's ad is a blatant lie.

FactCheck.org: Off Base on Sex Ed
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 10:20 AM
momrajum's Avatar
Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northern Lower MI
Posts: 1,261
It is not a blatant lie. That's been proven. A misrepresentation of what Obama SAYS his intentions were maybe, but the bill clearly states sex ed for K-12.
__________________
Melissa
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 10:27 AM
hambirg's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
This has nothing to do with sex-ed, but is kinda interesting. . .Did you know that FactCheck.org was owned by the Annenburg Foundation? I don't know if it implies anything, but the Annenburg's are a major Obama contributor.
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 10:37 AM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by momrajum View Post
It is not a blatant lie. That's been proven. A misrepresentation of what Obama SAYS his intentions were maybe, but the bill clearly states sex ed for K-12.
The announcer in the ad says, "Obama's one accomplishment? Legislation to teach comprehensive sex education to kindergarteners. Learning about sex before learning to read?" Here's the ad:
JohnMcCain.com - McCain-Palin 2008

It's a blatant lie.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 10:39 AM
momrajum's Avatar
Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northern Lower MI
Posts: 1,261
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
__________________
Melissa
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 02:23 PM
kathytheshopper's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by marilynk View Post
you know? Sometimes I wonder if politicians actually read these bills before they support them. And if they do read them, why do they support some (the wording on this one is horrible) and not others. I really do wonder if all politicians (regardless of party) try to do too much, or not enough on these bills.
Isn't this the bill that Obama did read and didn't like the wording of it and said he'd vote for it if it was worded like another bill but then when it was he didn't vote that way?
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 03:37 PM
hambirg's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathytheshopper View Post
Isn't this the bill that Obama did read and didn't like the wording of it and said he'd vote for it if it was worded like another bill but then when it was he didn't vote that way?

I think you are thinking about the abortion bill. The one that had to do with saving the life of a baby that was the result of a botched abortion.
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 03:50 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,298
Here is what I found of the bill, read it for yourself and decide, I guess.

Illinois General Assembly - Full Text of SB0099
__________________
Doing the right thing isn't always the same as doing the easy thing.
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 04:00 PM
hambirg's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by allinaugust View Post
Here is what I found of the bill, read it for yourself and decide, I guess.

Illinois General Assembly - Full Text of SB0099
Ugh! Seriously, I only made it about 3/4 of the way through it. It does mention age appropriate, but it also seems to say that AIDS prevention should be covered at every grade level. I'm not sure what the intetnion of the bill really is. What a terribly written bill. I can't imagine anybody supporting it, not because of the ideas behind it, just because it is so ambiguous.
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 04:13 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
And what about this bill makes it Obama's accomplishment since he neither wrote nor sponsored it?
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 04:38 PM
hambirg's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by kvmj View Post
And what about this bill makes it Obama's accomplishment since he neither wrote nor sponsored it?
It's my understanding that he voted in favor of it and supported it. Now I don't know what exactly "supported" it includes, maybe nothing more than voting for it.

I did find this. It is from the National Review, so take that into consideration. But I did find it interesting in that the reporter talked to the actual authors and sponsors of the bill. I don't know that his conclusions are right, but there is some good information regarding it:

On Sex-Ed Ad, McCain Is Right by Byron York on National Review Online

I think it's kind of a grey area.
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 05:01 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,670
Quote:
The Centers for Disease Control are currently funding an organization called the National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE) for the purpose of:

Providing HIV-related information and guidance to state boards of education and other education stakeholders on policies that promote effective HIV prevention for kindergarten through 12th grade students in schools across the nation.
Funded Partners - NASBE - DASH/HealthyYouth

Sounds like a Bush administration approved program. Shame on the States of Illinois, Arizona, Tennessee, Wyoming, and a number of other states for following CDC/Bush administration guidelines.
__________________
Ana
The Republicans have been putting lipstick on a pig for 8 years. Is a pitbull wearing lipstick an attempt to keep us from noticing the pig?
Sponsored Links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 05:42 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by hambirg View Post
It's my understanding that he voted in favor of it and supported it. Now I don't know what exactly "supported" it includes, maybe nothing more than voting for it.

I did find this. It is from the National Review, so take that into consideration. But I did find it interesting in that the reporter talked to the actual authors and sponsors of the bill. I don't know that his conclusions are right, but there is some good information regarding it:

On Sex-Ed Ad, McCain Is Right by Byron York on National Review Online

I think it's kind of a grey area.

I don't think it's grey at all. And I don't think much of Byron either. Obama neither wrote nor sponsored the bill and McCain calls it his "one accomplishment."

If I were a legislator, I would have voted for it. Hate to say it, but child molestation happens every day in this country. Kindergarters need to be told it's wrong and that they can tell someone who can make it stop.

The ad is completely dishonest.
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 05:50 PM
hambirg's Avatar
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by kvmj View Post
I don't think it's grey at all. And I don't think much of Byron either. Obama neither wrote nor sponsored the bill and McCain calls it his "one accomplishment."

If I were a legislator, I would have voted for it. Hate to say it, but child molestation happens every day in this country. Kindergarters need to be told it's wrong and that they can tell someone who can make it stop.

The ad is completely dishonest.
I'm not saying that I disagree with you. I meant that it is a grey area in Obama saying it was only for the innapropriate touching part that he supported it. Clearly the bill includes more than just that. I'm not saying I disagree with the intent of this bill either. . .not sure I would have voted for it, because it could have been written better.
__________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
- George Orwell Animal Farm
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 06:26 PM
Ultimate Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,236
I know that it was meant to modify the main sex ed legislation. The wording indicates to me that it was also an effort to thwart abstinence only education.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:33 AM.



Ad Management by RedTyger